New Members: Be sure to confirm your email address by clicking on the link that was sent to your email inbox. You will not be able to post messages until you click that link.
Can't explain. Is this a bug of the scanner or I don't understand how the scanner work.
I would expect the two scans below return the same number of results. The condition [ SMA(20,SCTR) >= 0 ] should be always true. ?
Would appreciate anyone can shed some light.
Thnx
1st scan returned 158 results -----
type is Stock ] and [ group is ETF ] and [ country is US ]
and [SCTR > 60] and [SCTR < 70 ]
2nd scan returned 138 results ----
type is Stock ] and [ group is ETF ] and [ country is US ]
and [SCTR > 60] and [SCTR < 70 ]
and [ SMA(20,SCTR) >= 0 ]
0
Answers
You could verify whether this is the case by putting the larger results into a list and adding the SCTR indicator to your chart style.
rank by [SMA(20,SCTR)]
could be a bug
if you run the scan with "rank by" as @lmkwin suggests - the results page shows about 20 symbols with no SCTR value. But, if you put the results into a list and add SCTR Line to the chart with an sma 20 overlay, it shows a SCTR line for every symbol and an MA.
So, that suggests the scan engine database and the charting database are using different data, or different criteria for SCTR groupings.
The technically correct terminology for etf SCTRs is sctr.us.etf, but even if you edit the scan for this refinement, the results are the same.
So, it seems either the scan engine sctr calculation procedure has not been told these symbols belong in the etf sctr calculation (some table has not been updated), or the chart engine sctr indicator has not been told to exclude them.
Support should probably be told.
Please visit my site
Edit Admin: link to site removed as links to third party promotional sites are not allowed.