New Members: Be sure to confirm your email address by clicking on the link that was sent to your email inbox. You will not be able to post messages until you click that link.
Search
-
So it looks like, if you freeze the video around the 26:13 mark, he uses the PPO for his LT, MT, ST. on a weekly chart. LT is 21,34,0 MT is 5,13,0 ST is 1,5,0 Bull is above 0 Bear is below 0 So the LT weekly PPO is Above 0 // to get the LT Bull part And the MT weekly PPO is greater than -1 and 4 weeks ago streak down 3…
-
I assume you mean by triple and double inside bars, three or two consecutive inside bars. So, to keep it simple, I'm going to define an inside bar as a bar with a lower high and a higher low than the previous bar. For daily, it would be and [high < 1 day ago high] and [low > 1 day ago low] For weekly, you have to add…
-
Seems to be an error in the way I'm using the "OR" function .... I get a different number of returns for this scan depending on the order sequence of the scan statements within the scan below .... anyone see what I am doing incorrectly .... thanks. [[favorites list = 126] or [favorites list = 195] or [favorites list =…
-
I add this line to a scan: and [weekly close < ( Lower weekly EMA Env(11,7) + Lower weekly EMA Env(22,7) )/2 ] and get this very un-useful error message: Could not parse "" located in the clause "( LOWER WEEKLY EMA ENV(11,7) + LOWER WEEKLY EMA ENV(22,7) )/2" or do they mean, we refuse to parse
-
I'm trying to write a simple scan that shows only NYSE and Nasdaq stocks that have price above 4 week and 10week simple moving averages. I also want stocks that have a weekly volume above 2,500,000 (500,000 daily average) Below is my written scan now - problem is it's finding tons of stocks that don't have the volume above…
-
[[ type = stock] or [group is ETF]] and [country is US] and [1 week ago close < weekly upper BB(20, .382)] and [ weekly close > weekly upper BB(20,.382)] or [[ 1 week ago close >weekly lower BB(20, .382)] and [ weekly close <weekly lower BB(20,.382)]] # Help nothing comes up...syntax is correct
-
Scan Error when adding multiplication by 100 to my, - This statement works OK and gives me results, eg, for MSFT as 0.713 and [ weekly EMA(10,weekly ROC(1)) / weekly EMA(10,absval(weekly ROC(1))) > 0.70] - I want to revise it to multiply results by 100 so the MSFT would then become 71.3. This is the revised scan statement…
-
[type = stock] and [optionable is true] and [Close > 20] and [Weekly MACD Signal(12,26,9) < -1.0] and [Weekly MACD Line(12,26,9) < -1.0] and [Weekly MACD Hist(12,26,9) > 0.0] and [Weekly MACD Hist(12,26,9) < 0.5] and [Weekly rsi(14) > 33] and [Volume > 1,500,000]
-
These are 2 lines of a scan I am trying to develop that are giving me error messages and [weekly Force(13) > 1 Week ago weekly Max(3, weekly Force(13)] and [weekly TSI(25,13,7) > 1 Week ago weekly Max(3, weekly TSI(25,13,7)] the messages are essentially the same The first line gives this message: Could not parse "(13"…
-
[group is SP500] or [group is SP600] or [group is SP400] or [group is NASDAQ100] and [ [ [weekly PPO Line(5,52,0) x 0] and // PPO crosses above zero [weekly CCI(52) x 0] ] or // CCI crosses above zero [ [weekly PPO Line(5,52,0) x 0] and // PPO crosses above zero [weekly EMA(52,close) > 5 weeks ago weekly EMA(52,close)] and…
-
Is there anything wrong with using the single work weekly in lieu of using the two words this week's? Example; If I want a weekly macd, can I just say weekly macd or do I have to say this week's weekly macd?
-
There are currently 423 products that trade weekly options including most major indices, stocks, and ETF's. Here are some of the advantages of weekly option trading. Weeklies tend to be more liquid allowing for better and faster fills. Weeklies have tighter bid/ask spreads minimizing slippage (take a look at the difference…
-
Hello, I'm merging the results of the following two scans: Scan 1: [type is stock] and [[exchange is NYSE] or [exchange is NASDAQ]] and [sma(50,volume) > 100000] and [Close > 5] and [Weekly PctDiff(weekly EMA(26,close), 1 week ago weekly EMA(26,close)) >= 2] and [Weekly PctDiff(1 week ago weekly EMA(26,close), 2 weeks ago…
-
Hello guys, I want to apply a scan when the EMA8 crosses up/down on EMA21, to the stocks on my chart-lists. I know that the syntax for the crossovers would be: - cross up: [ weekly ema(8, weekly close) x weekly ema(21, weekly close)] - cross down: [ weekly ema(8, weekly close) x weekly ema(21, weekly close)] How would the…
-
Good Day How do I create a scan showing weekly volume Grey instead of Red and Grey. I only want to scan for the weekly chart with grey weekly volume bar . thanks
-
Hi, following are my two scans: SCAN 1: [type is stock] and [[exchange is NYSE] or [exchange is NASDAQ]] and [sma(50,volume) > 100000] and [Close > 5] and [Weekly PctDiff(weekly EMA(26,close), 1 week ago weekly EMA(26,close)) >= 2] and [Weekly PctDiff(1 week ago weekly EMA(26,close), 2 weeks ago weekly EMA(26,close)) >= 2]…
-
Hello I am looking to create a scan to analyse weekly data and scan Engulfing patterns showing on weekly charts. It's predefined as daily , but I cannot find the commands to do to it on weekly.. Thanks for the help
-
The complete scan [Favorites list is 9] and [[[Weekly MACD Line(12,26,9) > 0.0] and [Weekly MACD Line(12,26,9) > Weekly MACD Signal(12,26,9)] and [Weekly MACD Line(12,26,9) < Last week's MACD Line(12,26,9)]] or [[Weekly MACD Line(12,26,9) > 0.0] and [Weekly MACD Line(12,26,9) < Weekly MACD Signal(12,26,9)] and [Weekly MACD…
-
I’m trying to detect when weekly MACD is rising, in other words, this week is higher than last week. This is what I tried, but it’s not matching perfectly with my chart list. Is it correct? [weekly MACD Line(12,26,1) > last week's weekly MACD Line(12,26,1)] and [favorites list is 37] I’m also wondering what weekly…
-
Hi, I want to scan for 50EMA x 200EMA during this week on the weekly chart. This is what I wrote but it gives me the crosses above of last week....does "weekly" mean over the last 5 trading days or from Mon - Fri, like the candle is formed? [weekly EMA(50, weekly close) x Weekly EMA(200, weekly close)] Thank you! Johan